11
I Use This!
Inactive

News

Analyzed about 24 hours ago. based on code collected 1 day ago.
Posted over 16 years ago
Revised patch
Posted over 16 years ago
Replying to gunnar: There's a rather bad breakage for gunnar_7_12.8 on the normal regressions: The typical problem can be examplified with semeai:73. In this position the patch changes the three white stones from a lunch to an eyespace. ... [More] As a consequence black is found to have two eyes and claims life, whereas white doesn't look alive, so the semeai is statically evaluated as a full win for black. [Less]
Posted over 16 years ago
Replying to gunnar: There is no breakage on the standard regressions for gunnar_7_12.7 and a small increase in reading nodes ( 0.089% 0.21% -0.041%). On STS-RV the result is five passes and no fails. The patch gunnar_7_12.7b has a mixed ... [More] breakage with 6 passes and 5 fails on the normal regressions plus increasing the owl nodes by 0.7%. On STS-RV it adds one more pass for STS-RV_1:58. The more complicated patch gunnar_7_12.7c retains the pass for STS-RV_1:58 but without any breakage on the normal regressions and the same node cost as gunnar_7_12.7. [Less]
Posted over 16 years ago
Replying to cisba: Replying to gunnar: I don't think this test should go into blunder.tst since that is reserved for moves that are so bad that passing is better. This is more a of a normal mistake. :-) Ok. Where to put it? The ... [More] big unsolved problem of computer science - The Naming of Things. I don't have any particularly good place to suggest. There are only a few test files with a clear purpose, and I don't think it fits any of them. Maybe it could be added to strategy5.tst or tactics1.tst. Additionally a complementary "owl_attack N9" test could be added to owl1.tst. [Less]
Posted over 16 years ago
Don't amalgamate dragons over three liberty strings or a specific class of two liberty strings.
Posted over 16 years ago by [email protected]
Replying to gunnar: I don't think this test should go into blunder.tst since that is reserved for moves that are so bad that passing is better. This is more a of a normal mistake. :-) Ok. Where to put it?
Posted over 16 years ago
There's a rather bad breakage for gunnar_7_12.8 on the normal regressions: owl:123 PASS 1 C5 [1 C5] trevorb:590 PASS M9 [H12|M9] semeai:73 FAIL 1 1 PASS [1 0 PASS] semeai:74 FAIL 0 0 PASS [1 0 (PASS|L13)] semeai:75 ... [More] FAIL 1 1 PASS [1 0 PASS] semeai:76 FAIL 0 0 PASS [1 0 (PASS|N3|K2)] semeai:77 FAIL 1 1 PASS [1 0 PASS] semeai:78 FAIL 0 0 PASS [1 0 (PASS|A6|C6|C1)] semeai:79 FAIL 1 1 PASS [1 0 PASS] semeai:80 FAIL 0 0 PASS [1 0 (PASS|E9|E8|J9|H5)] owl1:279 PASS 1 PASS [1 PASS] century2002:180 FAIL O11 [T9] auto_handtalk:3 FAIL 1 T15 [2 T15] gunnar:101 PASS T8 [T8] thrash:23 FAIL J6 [A5|D7] 13x13b:21 FAIL J13 [K11] seki:1106 FAIL C9 [C1] seki:2050 FAIL dead [alive] 4 PASS 14 FAIL Total nodes: 1704626871 3334488 12416594 ( 0.1% -0.03% 0.02%) For STS-RV it's rather the opposite, 14 passes, 2 fails: STS-RV_1:3 PASS 1 1 D8 [1 1 (D8|C3|B3|A3)] STS-RV_1:5 PASS 1 1 M4 [1 1 (M4|N4|R3|R2|R1)] STS-RV_1:20 PASS 1 1 T3 [1 1 (R3|S4|S2|T3)] STS-RV_1:54 PASS 1 0 O2 [1 0 (O2|O1|R2|Q1|S1)] STS-RV_1:59 PASS 0 0 PASS [0 0 PASS] STS-RV_1:158 PASS 1 1 P6 [1 1 (N3|O5|P6|Q6|R6|S6|T6)] STS-RV_1:160 FAIL 0 0 PASS [1 1 (N17|017|O16|O15|O14|R13|T12)] STS-RV_1:205 PASS 1 1 C2 [1 1 C2] STS-RV_Misc:4 PASS 1 1 A10 [1 1 A10] STS-RV_Misc:9 PASS 1 1 J1 [1 1 J1] STS-RV_Misc:14 PASS 1 0 B9 [1 0 B9] STS-RV_Misc:35 PASS 1 1 J1 [1 1 J1] STS-RV_Misc:42 PASS 1 0 A9 [1 0 A9] STS-RV_Misc:44 PASS 1 0 B9 [1 0 B9] STS-RV_RH:67 FAIL 0 0 PASS [1 1 B4] STS-RV_e:2 PASS 1 1 B17 [1 1 B17] [Less]
Posted over 16 years ago
Do some more distrusting of tactical moves in semeai reading.
Posted over 16 years ago
Don't play outer liberties in recognized eyespace.
Posted over 16 years ago
Don't amalgamate dragons over two liberty strings (probably not a good idea).