3
I Use This!
Activity Not Available

News

Posted over 4 years ago by John A. Peters
Robert Ackerman and I are working forth source code that will send an HTML file to chrome which then opens a window suitable for entering things like 2 2 + . That line of code gets sent back to forth for execution. The answer is then reported back In the chrome window. 4 Do you have any
Posted over 4 years ago by The Beez
That's why you do things like this: uBasic has about 60 keywords and with every single token they are checked. So I applied my binary search patch. About 80 opcodes, clean replace, worked first time, 1.6 times faster (about 40% increase). BAM! Hans Bezemer
Posted over 4 years ago by Beestje
Hi Ron, My build environment?! You'll laugh! https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/polishing-turd-hans-bezemer/ Yes, this is it. Ubuntu 16.x, 8 ARM cores, 2 gigs RAM, 32GB SDcard. Note it is more powerful than my first Linux computer and there are no problems whatsoever working on it. It's got Lyx,
Posted over 4 years ago by rjeffries
When you have time would you describe your new build environment? What OS are you using? Etc etc. Best regards Ron K Jeffries On Sun, Aug 4, 2019, 7:51 AM The Beez
Posted over 4 years ago by The Beez
Hi 4tH-ers! If you keep an eye on SVN, you'll see I made some final changes here. I've integrated David Johnsons excellent graphics contributions into the mainline and that tell you we're DONE! It took me a while to catch up after all calamities, but we're here. The manual is the only thing
Posted over 4 years ago by The Beez
Hi 4tH-ers! Normally, the 4tH preprocessor is speedy enough, but sometimes, there is a noticeable delay. Not enough to irritate you, but still. So I wondered if I could speed things up by applying binary search with some lookup tables. But would it do enough? Well, I decided to test the thing,
Posted over 4 years ago by The Beez
BTW, I've committed the code. It's in SVN. Hans Bezemer
Posted over 4 years ago by The Beez
Hi 4tH-ers! Don't be alarmed. There are several versions which never saw the light of day - especially before v3.5a. It's just that when the bytecode changes, the version changes. And I've decided to change the bytecode - AGAIN. After the discussion on DO..LOOP, I decided not to go that far. As
Posted over 4 years ago by The Beez
Hi 4tHers! My brand new Lyx installation was refusing to display images in preview. I'd already visited several fora, but I couldn't find the problem. The solution was to edit ImageMagick's policy.xml file. Even though it was a PDF that I supplied to LyX, and LyX ends up with a PNG, it was
Posted almost 5 years ago by The Beez
Of course, this should be DO: DO compiles to: FOR LITERAL (0)