212
I Use This!
Very Low Activity

News

Analyzed about 19 hours ago. based on code collected about 20 hours ago.
Posted about 14 years ago by Brett Zamir
In addition to my post just now, there is also the possibility of ECMAScript itself supporting the more advanced syntax (not sure if they would for reasons of backward-compatibility).
Posted about 14 years ago by Brett Zamir
@Jon. L: Yes, that's true--I guess you are talking about the fact that we escape "<" and ">"? Yeah, those could be removed, but 1) It is harmless to escape them, 2) Safer to behave like PHP in case someone is passing something back to PHP, 3) ... [More] I'm hoping at some point for us to port and build upon XRegExp so that our library does support the full PCRE syntax. [Less]
Posted about 14 years ago by John
The line, data = this.utf8_encode(data + ''); is incorrect. PHP treats input to base64_encode as a binary string. I had to comment out this code in order to get compatibility with existing PHP code that uses binary strings. I'd advise ... [More] removing this line altogether, it doesn't make sense, especially as the input is likely already in UTF-8 encoding, and if it's not then it's probably a binary string (or some other encoding, in any event that line shouldn't be there). [Less]
Posted about 14 years ago by JadeYe
Open Source Human Data Content Management
Posted about 14 years ago by
Posted about 14 years ago by
Posted about 14 years ago by
Posted about 14 years ago by
Posted about 14 years ago by
Posted about 14 years ago by