Posted
about 14 years
ago
by
Brett Zamir
In addition to my post just now, there is also the possibility of ECMAScript itself supporting the more advanced syntax (not sure if they would for reasons of backward-compatibility).
|
Posted
about 14 years
ago
by
Brett Zamir
@Jon. L: Yes, that's true--I guess you are talking about the fact that we escape "<" and ">"? Yeah, those could be removed, but 1) It is harmless to escape them, 2) Safer to behave like PHP in case someone is passing something back to PHP, 3)
|
Posted
about 14 years
ago
by
John
The line,
data = this.utf8_encode(data + '');
is incorrect. PHP treats input to base64_encode as a binary string. I had to comment out this code in order to get compatibility with existing PHP code that uses binary strings. I'd advise
|
Posted
about 14 years
ago
by
JadeYe
Open Source Human Data Content Management
|
Posted
about 14 years
ago
by
|
Posted
about 14 years
ago
by
|
Posted
about 14 years
ago
by
|
Posted
about 14 years
ago
by
|
Posted
about 14 years
ago
by
|
Posted
about 14 years
ago
by
|