Cloudy: Plasma and Spectral Simulations

I get one dex higher, 1.645E+04 K at the illuminated face, so if the development code is getting 16.3 kK then I think we're OK. Thanks for the quick reply. -

Hi Carla, ... Column 7 (the total flux) includes the transmitted incident radiation, but in the default setup nfnu does not (only diffuse emission from the

Hi Chris, This problem does not happen on our development branch, so apparently has been fixed. I think you have a workaround - increasing the limit to the

Hello, I have a couple of questions about the rates that Cloudy uses for the cosmic ray reactions. Firstly, I have been trying to set the HI ionisation rate to

Hi Peter and Gary, thanks for your reply. You are right, I have to compare with the observed flux the total flux, saved by using the command punch continuum,

the transmitted continuum is only starlight. Free-free, recombination, PAH emission, et al., are likely to contribute at 3.5 micron. the nFnu in the main

Hi Carla, Which entry from the trans_g24.con file did you use? Does it include the transmitted light from the central star? This is not included in the nFnu

Dear Peter, your advices are still very useful. However my doubts don't concern the differences between the modeled and observes fluxes, but rather the

The first model set, with the overly strong mm-IR luminosity, does produce the T_c > 10^10K. But, as you see from my later message, I ran a test using the AGN

Hi Carla, I assume that the distance is correct. Essentially you need a higher dust opacity to convert more starlight into IR flux. So the first thing to look